Inventing the Humanities

Friday, February 24, 2006

Being-Not Being: Richard Rodriguez's Hunger of Memory

In his narrative about growing up a second-generation immigrant in California, Richard Rodriguez skillfully examines the push/pull of negotiating his Mexican, Mexican-American and American identities. The alienation these conflicting identities create plays itself out in the ways Rodriguez depicts his quest for education, his particular brand of Catholicism, and the tension resulting from his bilingualism. This anxiety is apparent, for instance, in his pursuit of education. While gaining access to education brings a much-craved order, inspires pride and allows him to carve out an identity, it also propels him away from his home life, isolates him from his family, feminizes him, and thrusts him into a public sphere in which he is not altogether comfortable. This wavering between worlds, the conflict between simultaneous loving and loathing, and the chaos and confusion his hybridity bring about are what I found most palpable about Hunger of Memory. His sense of identity is continually shattered and then reconstituted by books, language, and social and professional contracts. Here are some questions the text brings up: Does Rodriguez become complicit with the forms of oppression he claims to be writing against? What problems arise for bilingual children and is bilingualism politicized?

2 Comments:

At 2:37 PM, Blogger chris r said...

Although Rodriguez's dilemma is real (of course) and his feelings are real (of course) and he has a strong command of English (of course), I struggled reading this book because I felt he pushed & forced the language too hard. I didn't hear the style. It's a muscular voice, I feel (to be sexist?), but my ear could never find his ear well. I'm not going to in any way attribute this to his language issues – it may be entirely divorced from it. But yes, of course, "yes" to both of your questions. I just felt blocked out from engaging in the text.

 
At 5:27 PM, Blogger Elissa said...

I agree with Chris to some extent. I feel as if the memoir aspect of his autobiography should have remained just that. His arguments about language and bilingual education do not seem to me to belong in a memoir, but rather as part of a separate, more critical/theoretical rhetoric.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home